<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>

<channel>
	<title>JBuzz-Word &#187; 2007 &#187; November &#187; 27</title>
	<atom:link href="http://people.byte-code.com/dpanelli/2007/11/27/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://people.byte-code.com/dpanelli</link>
	<description>...Java, buzzwords and random development topics</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2008 13:49:21 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<item>
		<title>Do we need POA?</title>
		<link>http://people.byte-code.com/dpanelli/2007/11/27/do-we-need-poa/</link>
		<comments>http://people.byte-code.com/dpanelli/2007/11/27/do-we-need-poa/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2007 11:39:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Random Tech]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://people.byte-code.com/dpanelli/2007/11/27/do-we-need-poa/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yesterday I was thinking about architectures, not only software architecture, but system-wide architecture.
I was wandering that probably that a given &#8220;architecture&#8221; is efficient and cost effective not for the technologies(from a tech-only point of view!) that it uses,but from the processes it uses.
Think a about a common scenario like deploying a new server: if this [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yesterday I was thinking about architectures, not only software architecture, but system-wide architecture.<br />
I was wandering that probably that a given &#8220;architecture&#8221; is efficient and cost effective not for the technologies(from a tech-only point of view!) that it uses,but from the processes it uses.</p>
<p>Think a about a common scenario like deploying a new server: if this process is 15 days long because we need to fulfill some absurd process steps,in the end the OS of the deployed platform does it really can change the &#8220;weight&#8221; of the process?(Maybe you can&#8217;t deploy a new server because you need a license&#8230;so your process is &#8220;bounded&#8221; by the technology chosen&#8230;)</p>
<p>For sure the tech-stack you choose have to support your architectural-processes(in the tech-point of view of course,but not only), but probably if the process are agile and effective the technologies used are less central.<br />
Today we see the technology stack as the central point because we adapt the processes to the technology and not vice-versa, and probably old technologies embody old processes and way of thinking.</p>
<p>Is time mature for a POA? is Process Oriented Architecture the evolution of SOA?</p>
<p>(..In my heart I&#8217;m always a buzzword lover;))</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://people.byte-code.com/dpanelli/2007/11/27/do-we-need-poa/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

